


MARLIN FIREARMS CLOSING ITS DOORS
Even if you do not own a gun you need to know this.
Marlin Firearms is already closing its doors! They are doing it to us,
America !
This needs to be spread to all gun owners and sportsmen/women. We cannot
rely on the media to inform us of these types of matters.
Something you may not know that Is happening ...
Who is buying the companies that manufacture guns? For the last several
years a company called The Freedom Group has been buying up gun and
ammunition manufacturers. Some of the companies are Bushmaster, Marlin,
Remington, DPMS, Dakota Arms and H&R. Some people worry that this Freedom Group is
going to control most of the firearms companies in the United States .
What a perfect way to control guns. Now if you do some digging you will
see that The Freedom Group is owned by a company called Cerberus Capital
Management.
Guess who controls Cerberus? GEORGE SOROS, Obama's chief financier! He GEORGE SOROS.
wants to restrict or ban all civilian guns.
Please pass this on to all your freedom loving friends. This needs to
come out. Why have we not heard about this in the "mainstream" media? I would
think this would be BIG news. (George Soros also owns Progressive Insurance). If you don't know who
George Soros is, you need to do some research. This One-World Government atheist backed Obama with millions of dollars and Obama is a puppet on a string
controlled by Soros.
Send this to every gun owner you know!
Snopes verification below: George Soros
1. _snopes.com: Marlin Firearms Bought Out by George Soros_
(http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/freedom.asp) •••
George Soros is buying up firearms manufacturers through an outfit called
the Freedom Group?
...George Soros is buying up and shutting down firearms manufacturers,
including Marlin Firearms. Example: [Collected via e-mail, October 2011]
For...
...control guns. Now if you do some digging you will see that The Freedom
Group is owned by a company called Cerberus Capital Management. Guess who...
...and financier George Soros: Cerberus is a privately traded company which
was established in 1992 by Stephen A. Feinberg, and the company's list
of senior...George Soros:
Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:38:59
GMThttp://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/freedom.aspMARLIN FIREARMS CLOSING ITS DOORS

Even if you do not own a gun you need to know this.
Marlin Firearms is already closing its doors! They are doing it to us,
America !
This needs to be spread to all gun owners and sportsmen/women. We cannot
rely on the media to inform us of these types of matters.
![]() | For years, those of us who have tried to warn the American public that Big Brother monitors all Internet users were demonized, vilified and ridiculed. Now, the mainstream media has proven us correct. "The U.S. government -- and likely your own government, for that. |
matter --
is either watching your online activity every minute of the day through
automated methods and non-human eavesdropping techniques, or has the
ability to dip in as and when it deems necessary -- sometimes with a
warrant, sometimes without," ZDNet reported earlier this month. "That tin-foil hat really isn't going to help. Take it off, you look silly."
The Petraeus case
Where's the proof that the government has this capability?
You might recall a fellow by the name of (retired) Gen. David Petraeus. He's been in the news lately.
This
four-star general-turned-CIA chief just resigned his post after news
broke that he had engaged in an extra-marital affair with is biographer,
herself a West Point graduate and former Army officer.
What led to this shocking discovery was Petraeus' use, of all things, Google's online email service, Gmail.
According to federal law, mind you, authorities are not legally permitted to electronically snoop around in your email box.
"The
government can't just wander through your emails just because they'd
like to know what you're thinking or doing," Stewart Baker, a former
assistant secretary at the Homeland Security Department who's now in
private law practice, told The Associated Press. "But if the government is investigating a crime, it has a lot of authority to review people's emails."
Or, in the case of the CIA, if the agency wants to track a suspect ostensibly for "national security" purposes. Ditto the NSA.
The
wrangling of Petraeus' email account has certainly landed him in a
world of trouble, but his story has also, once again, ignited a new the
debate over when, how and why governments and law enforcement agencies
alike are able to access the email accounts of ordinary citizens - even if they head up the most powerful spy agency in the world.
Granted, experts say "the little people" needn't worry much about having their online presence tracked. Agencies like the CIA
generally tend to have bigger fish to fry, so to speak. But
nevertheless, the technology to pilfer email accounts at will obviously
exists.
"Forget ECHELON, or signals intelligence, or the
interception of communications by black boxes installed covertly in data
centers," writes Zack Whittaker for ZDNet. "Intelligence
agencies and law enforcement bodies can access - thanks to the shift
towards Web-based email services in the cloud - but it's not as exciting
or as Jack Bauer-esque as one may think or hope for."
(Editor's
Note: ECHELON, for those who are unfamiliar with it, is the name of "a
global Communications Interception (COMINT) system created by the United
States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand to
routinely and indiscriminately monitor and record all forms of
electronic communications worldwide (both military and civilian) and
overseen by the National Security Agency," according to one published
description of the program.)
How the top CIA official got busted
When
he set up his private Gmail account, Petraeus used a pseudonym and
composed email messages but never sent them. They were instead saved as
drafts. His lover, Paula Broadwell, would then log in under the same
account, read the drafts then reply to them in the same manner - as a
draft, without actually sending the message.
The exchanges would
not be sent across the networks through Google's data centers, which
would make it nearly impossible for the NSA or any other ELINT
(electronic intelligence) agency (like Britain's GCHQ or the Israeli
Mossad) to "read" the messages while they are in transit between
accounts.
Other sinister operators - terrorists, pedophiles and the like - have been known to use the same trick to avoid detection, ZDNet reported.
"But
surely IP addresses are logged and noted? When emails are sent and
received, yes. But the emails were saved in draft and therefore were not
sent. However, Google may still have a record of the IP addresses of
those who logged into the account," the report said.
In the end, the FBI used a little-know law called the Stored Communications Act, which is part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act,
as the basis for getting a warrant to view Petraeus' private Gmail
account. And that's how agents found the stored messages that were never
actually sent.
"Once it knew Ms. Broadwell was the sender of the
threatening messages, the FBI got a warrant that gave it covert access
to the anonymous email account," the BBC's Mark Ward reported.
 | Millions of Americans have long suspected that the so-called "mainstream media" is big-time controlled, whether selectively or institutionally. A recent New York Times story not only substantiates that belief, it proves just how controlled the messages are that are coming... |
DISCLAIMER
I DO NOT CLAIM OWNERSHIP OF ALL PHOTOS AND ARTWORK USED IN THIS BLOG OR IT'S CONTENT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION Purpose of our Charity
Not Open Yet Help us raise money for our first Container Home.