Search This Blog

Showing posts with label EPA Sucks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EPA Sucks. Show all posts

MY way of thinking about the upcoming election..




Here is the way I feel. I am not trying to convince anyone 

1.  Hillary: held accountable for her previous wrongs!

2. Put "GOD" back in America !!!

3. Borders: Closed or tightly guarded!
  
4. Congress: On the same retirement & healthcare plans as everybody else. (plus term limitations)
  
5. Congress: Obey its own laws NOW!
  
6. Language: English only!
  
7. Culture: Constitution and the Bill of Rights!
  
8. Drug Free: Mandatory Drug Screening before & during Welfare!
  
9. Freebies: NONE to Non-Citizens!
  
10. Budget: Balance the damn thing!
  
11. Foreign Countries: Stop giving them our money!  Charge them for our help!  We need it here.
  
12. Fix the TAX CODE!
  
And most of all.
  
13. "RESPECT OUR MILITARY AND OUR FLAG!!"

Very Important Message From Texas Attorney General

This is how I feel about the UN





http://contentz.mkt5241.com/ra/2013/13925/04/17142864/AbbottLogoHeader.jpe 
Your Liberty -- as a United States citizen -- was weakened and threatened yesterday when the Obama Administration helped the United Nations pass the Arms Trade Treaty.  Immediately after this disappointing vote, I wrote a letter to President Obama urging him not to sign the treaty.  If the President signs the treaty allowing the UN to be involved in regulating firearms in the U.S. , Texas will lead the charge to have the treaty overturned in court as a violation of the U.S. Constitution.  I need your support.  Please help us get the word out by referring 3 of your friends right now, and forwarding this email to 5 of your friends.  Together, we can make a difference.  America is exceptional in part because our Constitution safeguards our individual liberties – including the right to keep and bear arms enshrined in the Second Amendment.  The new UN treaty threatens your rights:
  • it doesn't recognize the individual right to keep and bear arms or the fundamental right to defend yourself, your family, or your property;
  • it empowers a new UN bureaucracy focused on firearms restrictions that will be run by international bureaucrats who are not accountable to the people of the United States .
  • it could impose firearm registration requirements that may empower international authorities to get information about American citizens and businesses.
This UN treaty does more than trample Second Amendment rights.  It also threatens to erode all liberties guaranteed to Americans in the Constitution by giving the UN power to govern our lives.  Please refer 3 of your friends today and forward this important message to 5 of your friends right now.  Your voice must be heard on this issue.  When the Constitution says, “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” it means no one—including the UN—can infringe upon that right.  UN treaties do not trump the Constitution.  And with your help, we will make that message clear to President Obama and this administration.
 
Sincerely,
http://contentz.mkt5241.com/ra/2013/13925/04/17142864/AbbottSignature.jpg
Greg Abbott

Mainstream media now openly admits the FBI and CIA are reading all your emails



via NaturalNews.com on 11/17/12

For years, those of us who have tried to warn the American public that Big Brother monitors all Internet users were demonized, vilified and ridiculed. Now, the mainstream media has proven us correct. "The U.S. government -- and likely your own government, for that.



 matter -- is either watching your online activity every minute of the day through automated methods and non-human eavesdropping techniques, or has the ability to dip in as and when it deems necessary -- sometimes with a warrant, sometimes without," ZDNet reported earlier this month. "That tin-foil hat really isn't going to help. Take it off, you look silly."

The Petraeus case

Where's the proof that the government has this capability?

You might recall a fellow by the name of (retired) Gen. David Petraeus. He's been in the news lately.

This four-star general-turned-CIA chief just resigned his post after news broke that he had engaged in an extra-marital affair with is biographer, herself a West Point graduate and former Army officer.

What led to this shocking discovery was Petraeus' use, of all things, Google's online email service, Gmail.

According to federal law, mind you, authorities are not legally permitted to electronically snoop around in your email box.

"The government can't just wander through your emails just because they'd like to know what you're thinking or doing," Stewart Baker, a former assistant secretary at the Homeland Security Department who's now in private law practice, told The Associated Press. "But if the government is investigating a crime, it has a lot of authority to review people's emails."

Or, in the case of the CIA, if the agency wants to track a suspect ostensibly for "national security" purposes. Ditto the NSA.

The wrangling of Petraeus' email account has certainly landed him in a world of trouble, but his story has also, once again, ignited a new the debate over when, how and why governments and law enforcement agencies alike are able to access the email accounts of ordinary citizens - even if they head up the most powerful spy agency in the world.

Granted, experts say "the little people" needn't worry much about having their online presence tracked. Agencies like the CIA generally tend to have bigger fish to fry, so to speak. But nevertheless, the technology to pilfer email accounts at will obviously exists.

"Forget ECHELON, or signals intelligence, or the interception of communications by black boxes installed covertly in data centers," writes Zack Whittaker for ZDNet. "Intelligence agencies and law enforcement bodies can access - thanks to the shift towards Web-based email services in the cloud - but it's not as exciting or as Jack Bauer-esque as one may think or hope for."

(Editor's Note: ECHELON, for those who are unfamiliar with it, is the name of "a global Communications Interception (COMINT) system created by the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand to routinely and indiscriminately monitor and record all forms of electronic communications worldwide (both military and civilian) and overseen by the National Security Agency," according to one published description of the program.)

How the top CIA official got busted

When he set up his private Gmail account, Petraeus used a pseudonym and composed email messages but never sent them. They were instead saved as drafts. His lover, Paula Broadwell, would then log in under the same account, read the drafts then reply to them in the same manner - as a draft, without actually sending the message.

The exchanges would not be sent across the networks through Google's data centers, which would make it nearly impossible for the NSA or any other ELINT (electronic intelligence) agency (like Britain's GCHQ or the Israeli Mossad) to "read" the messages while they are in transit between accounts.

Other sinister operators - terrorists, pedophiles and the like - have been known to use the same trick to avoid detection, ZDNet reported.

"But surely IP addresses are logged and noted? When emails are sent and received, yes. But the emails were saved in draft and therefore were not sent. However, Google may still have a record of the IP addresses of those who logged into the account," the report said.

In the end, the FBI used a little-know law called the Stored Communications Act, which is part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, as the basis for getting a warrant to view Petraeus' private Gmail account. And that's how agents found the stored messages that were never actually sent.

"Once it knew Ms. Broadwell was the sender of the threatening messages, the FBI got a warrant that gave it covert access to the anonymous email account," the BBC's Mark Ward reported.

Biased Media Tells Only One Side

 
Just the Short List of Media Coverage during the 2012 Election
 
Presidential Leadership
Congress hasn’t passed a budget in 3 years, the press says nothing.
Military personnel have to be bribed or coerced into attending Presidential appearances, they cannot respect their Commander and Chief; the press says nothing.
There are more law suites filed against the US Government by its own employees and internal divisions than at any time in history, the press says nothing.
The pledge to unite has been so totally ignored that our political division is at its highest since the Civil War, the press says nothing.
 
Administration’s Track Record
There is none, mostly just setbacks, no tangible successes of any kind other than “unity”, “hope” and “change”….and a hollow claim to have killed Osama Bin Laden; the press says nothing.
 
Foreign Policy
In the past Obama has bowed to foreign leaders and apologizes to them thereby weakening our global position; the press said nothing.
Recently our embassies were stormed, an ambassador was horribly murdered, other US citizens and military personnel were killed, but Obama approved continued foreign aide to the perpetrators, apologized for the American-made film that gave them the excuse to riot, and does nothing to bring them to justice; the press says nothing.
Today Iran is threatening Israel and the US with military and terrorist actions because of Obama’s failed foreign policy regarding Iran’s nuclear weapons program and our neglected alliance with Israel; the press says nothing.
 
Domestic Policy
Food prices take the highest jump in 50 years and are project to go much higher; the press says nothing.
“Temporary” amnesty is given to alien workers in order to buy votes while our system is overburdened with a huge number of unemployed US CITZENS; the press says nothing.
Insurance premiums and medical costs take huge increases in spite of Obama’s forced health care reforms; the press says nothing.
 
Energy
Gas prices soar; the press says nothing.
Every major energy producer has put their money squarely against Obama instead of the traditional hedging of their bets by backing both candidates; the press says nothing.
 
Economic Policy
The value of the dollar has shrunk more in the past 2 years than during any time in US history; the press says nothing.
The gargantuan, unread stimulus program Democrats rammed trough Congress didn’t have any measurable positive effect on economic recovery; the press says nothing.
The Obama administration says he created 4.5 million jobs but ignores the 4.9 million job decline resulting in a net 400,000 net job loss; the press says nothing.
Obama touts an 8% unemployment rate but doesn’t include those working two to three jobs just getting by until they get a real job, or the people who have stopped looking for work and settle for jobless benefits; the press says nothing.
The National Federation of Independent Business, the US Chamber of Commerce and the National Association for the Self-Employed along with many others have surveyed their members who have all said the health care mandates will kill approximately 1.2 million jobs in 2013 and ‘14; the press says nothing.
Greece has fallen yet Obama continues to head down the exact same path that historically ends in social collapse; the press says nothing.
We don’t take in enough in tax revenues to pay for essential services and still service the interest on our debt; the press says nothing.
 
National Security
Border security is a joke and our friend Mr. Holder isn’t helping with his crazy Fast and Furious schemes; the press says nothing.
Credit is taken for political gain after an effort to eliminate Osama Bin Ladin was carried out with very little effort by Obama; the press says nothing.
Military morale is at its lowest point in history, suicides are at their highest, the press says nothing.
 
Race
No white man could have ever gained the presidency with such a deplorable record of failure and inexperience; the press says nothing.
This presidency is riddled with race baiting and side taking without review of the facts; the press says nothing
 
Religion
Obama praises his own attitudes of religious freedom yet wages a quiet but documented war against the actions and practices of Christians; the press says nothing.
Obama uses reverence when he refers to Muslims or the Koran yet uses distain when talking of Catholics and the Bible; the press says nothing.
Countless criticisms are made of Romney’s Mormonism but none are made of Obama being a closet Muslim, Biden’s Catholicism is accepted but Ryan’s isn’t; the press says nothing.
 
Romney makes his “47%” statement which was fairly accurate; the press goes ape shit and calls the election.
 
 
 

GREAT EMAIL I RECEIVED

LET'S SEE IF I GOT THIS   CORRECT?
  RE: 3 American Hikers Now In The NEWS
-------------------------------------------------------------------


IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER
 
ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD LABOR.

cid:F51C5C5C164E48EBA47971D785D67507@your4dacd0ea75


IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER
 
ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED INDEFINITELY.
 
cid:55728B1EE09144D491EB04709F57A4E2@your4dacd0ea75


IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER
 
ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.
 
cid:6FE6382C7E3A46249483F11F7BB52127@your4dacd0ea75


IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER
 
ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE JAILED.
 
cid:2F87623203424858A658B22674380B9D@your4dacd0ea75


IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER
 
ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE HEARD FROM AGAIN
. 
cid:AD5549A6D9434DCEBE4826E73DA2F214@your4dacd0ea75


IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU
 
WILL BE BRANDED A SPY AND YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.

cid:580EA8D29F244C0FA0EFE1EE274F76BF@your4dacd0ea75


IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY
 
YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO POLITICAL PRISON TO ROT.
 
cid:8C8D22C9571148699C4D06B2D0926B15@your4dacd0ea75


IF YOU CROSS THE U.S. BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET !

A JOB, 
cid:C0581CEB917A47B4AD704BD67714FCAC@your4dacd0ea75        A DRIVERS LICENSE, cid:EEE9EEFF756345B0B6790403E32F7B03@your4dacd0ea75
SOCIAL SECURITY CARD, 
cid:1962CDF12BE842EEB403BC4353FC3561@your4dacd0ea75   WELFARE,



FOOD STAMPS, 
cid:91C8E202E4CE49F3991AC2DC8FAD2115@your4dacd0ea75   CREDIT CARDS, cid:4F328B14E36F4CDCAC97E0B4FC254561@your4dacd0ea75
SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE,   
cid:B910DEC4631447A38BC8F3AA6210290B@your4dacd0ea75



FREE EDUCATION, 
cid:0DED89FAADA04001A4EB3BD4EB25DA27@your4dacd0ea75FREE HEALTH CARE, cid:B8CC7788DEAB43BB98A153249CF8EAB4@your4dacd0ea75
A LOBBYIST IN WASHINGTON 
cid:B922E6830E1E4924A0A0953ED2070675@your4dacd0ea75BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS PRINTED IN YOUR LANGUAGE cid:1A925891ADCD4DFD8F4C8EF05F353733@your4dacd0ea75

THE RIGHT TO CARRY YOUR COUNTRY'S FLAG WHILE YOU
PROTEST THAT YOU DON'T GET ENOUGH RESPECT 
cid:B186FE408E5B473B8ADC3FBB1E375971@your4dacd0ea75cid:53F29C4F07674096BB86BF843D662640@your4dacd0ea75cid:945EB5A5FF6842218428DECEC55F1351@your4dacd0ea75cid:61167FEB06C54DEB88FAE38042908B49@your4dacd0ea75

AND, IN MANY INSTANCES, YOU CAN VOTE. 
cid:E64B407CE69A4A4CA936D8068D3A5291@your4dacd0ea75

The History of Social Security








Franklin Delano. Roosevelt
32nd. President
, Democrat
Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945
Our Social Security:
Franklin Delano Roosevelt (terms of office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945), a Democrat who introducedthe Social Security (FICA) Program.  





He Promised:
     
1.)     That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,
2.)     That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first  $1,400 of their annual incomes into the Program,

3.)     That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,
4.)     That the money the participants put into the Independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the General operating fund, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and
5.)     That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.





Many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now  receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to'put away'—so you may be interested in the following:

Lyndon Baines Johnson 36th. President,Democrat
Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 toJanuary 20, 1969
                          
        

James Earl Carter, Jar
(
Jimmy Carter)
39th
 President, Democrat
Term of Office: January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981

Thomas Jefferson
3rd
President, Democrat
Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781


"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have". 

                                Thomas Jefferson

The EPA causing higher prices for Texas Electricity.

Another Free Market Failure Accusation About Texas Electricity Deregulation

Clean Coal Power Mike Norman with the Fort Worth Star Telegram hits on the topic of if Texas deregulation is really working. I assume he places blame on deregulation as the reason for the Texas power supply failure because the title of his article states, “The Texas free market for electricity just isn’t cutting it“. Maybe he is just meaning that as good as deregulation is it can’t stop the EPA and other non-governmental organizations from halting all oil based energy production thereby raising consumer costs. Deregulation being a failure is a popular argument because any time prices go up or supply capacity is reached we hear about it from the political side that benefits the most from this view.
Is deregulation to blame for every time something bad happens in the deregulated Texas electricity market? No you can’t always blame it on deregulation but it is a piece of the puzzle so yes it is to blame sometimes. The main problem with deregulation isn’t inefficiencies building electric grid infrastructure and power production as this gets approved by the state and then shutdown by the EPA and federal government, not deregulation. Texas has broken up the generation companies and such away to allow new investors to come in and build power facilities but not many have filled this hole left open for increased competition. I think new investors have not come in because you are talking about investing in and building highly federally regulated things like coal, natural gas, and nuclear power facilities.  What new investors want to do what TXU just got shutdown by the EPA for trying to do? I see problems with how some retail providers try and use tricks to market their electric rates but regarding power supply being built out the bottleneck seems to be in government regulation still being in the mix too much.
Even if the market was regulated again under one monopoly per electric utility area you would just as easily be able to blame brownouts and blackouts on the monopoly regulated electric utilities just like deregulation gets blamed for things now. I don’t think Mike is trying to place all the blame on deregulation but he is pointing out that you will see an electric bill increase regardless of the provider you choose because of some recent failures in the Texas deregulated market. You see you very likely will find more non-negotiable ERCOT related fees on your electric bill eventually because of lack of electric supply available to meet demand but who is really to blame for this?
Mike explains that a free market should work in theory because investors are encouraged to place their money where the highest return will be received and in so doing offer just enough electricity to cover the demand as well as spikes in demand. In a perfect system the investor is rewarded a maximum profit for producing just the right amount of power with very little waste left over.
The problem Mike sees with the current deregulated market in Texas is that power plants break down or have to be shutdown to fix or maintain it resulting in loss of supply. If Murphy’s Law is in effect and a power demand spike occurs around the same time as a maintenance shutdown all of a sudden there is not enough power to go around for everyone.
These imperfections are problems that political powers bring up in order to fault the great electricity deregulation experiment of 2002. Will this blame game reverse deregulation in Texas? I really doubt that deregulation can be reversed anytime soon. There is huge public support for energy choice in Texas. Many people can show you on their electric bills how they have saved money because of deregulation simply from using our Electricity Bid website.

Is Deregulation to Blame for Lack of Sufficient Power Supply in Texas?

The problem we are faced with in regards to electric power supply in Texas for 2012 is unreliable power supply due to not enough power plants in operation. Is deregulation responsible for this lack of power?
No! In fact TXU was approved for and planning to build 11 new coal fired power plants that utilized clean burning technology and significantly reduced pollution from these plants compared to the old mothballed coal plants from the past. The prior mayor of Houston and Democratic nominee for governor of Texas, Bill White complained in 2010 that these plants were unnecessary but now they seem all too necessary. ERCOT predicts very tight power supplies this summer and this has politicians frantic but I’m sitting here wondering why we didn’t just get started on those 11 coal plants in 2010?
I think what Pat said has a lot to do with our problems…..Pat Ennis with Priority Power Management said, “”I’m not the smartest guy around, but I’d be willing to bet that… we’re not going to have any coal plants built here in Texas for a long time — between the EPA and the environmentalists, coal is kind of a no-no.”
The state of Texas has been contending with attacks from the Environmental Defense Fun and the EPA in regards to an argument that is mainly about the states CO2 emission levels. Instead of focusing their argument primarily on pollution like mercury levels and other scientifically verifiable pollutants they were able to stop 11 new coal fired power plants from being built by TXU because of a global warming argument.
Many scientists and climate scientists non-affiliated or backed by the United Nations IPCC organization disagree that global warming has a negative environmental impact or that man has anything to do with it. Over the last decade their has been a decline in average global temperatures and so to even argue CO2 levels to prevent Texas from expanding their power capacity only serves to hurt these environmental activists causes.

What Can Texans Do to Increase Power Supply?

Does anyone remember back a few years ago when TXU proposed building multiple state of the art clean burning coal power plants? These power plants would have significantly updated the power infrastructure in Texas but the plan was shutdown because of environmental nut jobs. Even though the power plants would have been state of the art cheap coal power with significant reductions in pollution compared to current coal power plants in operation the plan did not go through. The state of Texas must fight the EPA and federal government politically where it hurts and take back our state and its ability to provide power to our citizens.
Even with an unsatisfactory amount of power generation plants built in Texas we have seen a steady increase in large commercial and industrial facilities building on-site power grid infrastructure that are little mini power generators for their companies. These miniature power generators also known as distributed generation systems account for a large portion of the overall electricity consumption in Texas. During peak demand periods in the day these generators can turn on resulting in no need for the state to start rolling blackouts in residential neighborhoods.
Popout
The Texas demand curtailment program has been a huge success. Companies are paid to enroll in a program that they do not even have to participate in when and if they are asked to turn off their power for maybe only 20 – 30 minutes in the span of 1 month. The program is enrolled to it’s limits each time Texas opens it back up. What does this mean? There are likely more than enough large commercial and industrial facilities that would jump at the chance to shutdown production for a short interval in exchange for being paid by the state of Texas to do so. Consider that many large companies like this shutdown once a month anyway to test their back up generators so why not get paid to do this?
Solar generation at this time is not a good option for solving the states problems but has limited uses.  As we have seen, large federally backed companies like Solyndra have not even been able to stay a float because of the expense it costs to produce cheap affordable power using solar. Hey I am a fan of solar but like most people I can’t afford to build a solar off the grid system on my home or business. If I can’t afford the system like most of us why would you think the federal government can? We are at record breaking tax deficits in the beginning stages of an economic collapse and those tax dollars are to be used for things that are considered affordable and have at least a 10 year return on investment. Wind power is a partial option but is only viable to use in combination with natural gas power generation as it can share in the control systems and connections to the grid.
The smart meters, and energy efficiency programs utilities across the state offer continue to assist in teaching home owners how to make their homes more efficient and lower their monthly energy bill. These programs should continue to be encouraged and promoted through local electric utilities that control the power infrastructure.

 I am an Energy Consultant for Ambit Energy. Take your last bill, go to my website www.BestPricedElectricity.com and see if you are paying to much.  Jesse Smith

DISCLAIMER

I DO NOT CLAIM OWNERSHIP OF ALL PHOTOS AND ARTWORK USED IN THIS BLOG OR IT'S CONTENT.

Not open yet DONATIONS FOR CONTAINER HOMES

TexasContainerHomes.Org

TexasContainerHomes.Org
Charity For Veterans With Needs

UNDER CONSTRUCTION Purpose of our Charity

Not Open Yet Help us raise money for our first Container Home.

SPEAKEASY SPEED TEST

Speakeasy Speed Test